Tuesday, September 23, 2008

THE PLEDGE TO ELIMINATE DRUNK DRIVING

Every year, nearly 13,000 people are killed by drunk drivers with an illegal alcohol level of .08 BAC or above. That means that every month more than 1,000 families must live with the tragic consequences of drunk driving. Since MADD was founded in 1980, alcohol-related fatalities have declined by more than 40 percent, but progress has stalled in recent years.

That is why MADD launched a major offensive in the war against drunk driving the Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving.

Through the four elements below, the Campaign makes the idea of eliminating one the United States’ primary health threats a real possibility.

Together we can take the fight against drunk driving to a new and unprecedented level. Join the thousands of people nationwide who have signed the Pledge.


By joining the Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving, I pledge full support of:

  • Increased DUI enforcement including twice-yearly crackdowns during major holidays and enforcement efforts such as sobriety checkpoints and saturation patrols in all 50 states.
  • Use of alcohol ignition interlock technologies to reduce repeat offenses working towards mandatory ignition interlocks for all convicted drunk drivers.
  • Exploration and development of advanced vehicle-based technology devices to detect if a driver has an illegal alcohol level and to prevent that driver from operating the vehicle.
  • Public support from you and other concerned citizens nationwide led by MADD, its affiliates and members.

Ignition Interlock

Where we stand: MADD is dedicated to supporting state legislation that expands the use of current alcohol ignition interlock technology so that interlocks are mandatory for all convicted drunk drivers in all 50 states. MADD works closely with state lawmakers to encourage passage of this lifesaving legislation.
The main reason people drive drunk today is because they can. Technology currently exists that has the potential to eliminate repeat drunk driving offenses – the alcohol ignition interlock. To realize a nation without drunk driving, we must substantially increase the use of ignition interlocks to include all convicted drunk driving offenders.
Ignition interlocks prevent people who have alcohol in their system from driving a car. An operator breathes into an interlock device to determine blood alcohol concentration. If there is measurable alcohol in the blood, the vehicle does not start. What Is an Alcohol Ignition Interlock?
  • An alcohol ignition interlock is a small, sophisticated device – about the size of a cell phone – which is installed into the starting circuit of a vehicle.
  • A driver must blow into the device and the vehicle will not start if the driver has measurable alcohol (set to a predetermined level) in their system.
  • If the driver does not have alcohol above the measurable level in their system, the vehicle will start normally.
  • Interlocks may be set for “running retests,” which require a driver to provide breath tests at regular intervals, preventing drivers from asking a sober friend to start the car.
  • If a driver fails a running retest, the vehicle’s horn will honk and/or the lights will flash to alert law enforcement – the vehicle will not stop. The interlock does not have the ability to stop the vehicle once it is running for safety reasons.

Alcohol ignition interlocks are proven to be an effective tool in the battle against drunk driving.

Interlock Facts
  • Alcohol ignition interlocks are proven to be an effective tool in the battle against drunk driving.
  • Studies have shown ignition interlocks are an average of 64 percent effective in reducing repeat drunk driving offenses.[1]
  • Research shows that those convicted of drunk driving for the first time have driven drunk more than 87 times before their first arrest.[2]
  • Two-thirds of drunk driving offenders continue to drive even when their license is suspended.
  • Only one out of eight convicted drunk drivers each year currently has an interlock on their vehicle.
  • There are 1.4 million DUI/DWI arrests and about 1 million convictions made every year but only 135,000 vehicles with ignition interlocks nationwide.
  • 65 percent of the public favors mandatory interlocks for first-time convicted offenders.[3]
  • 85 percent of the public favors mandatory interlocks for repeated convicted offenders.[4]
  • Offenders themselves believe interlocks are a fair and effective sanction:
    • 82 percent believe interlocks were very effective in preventing them from driving after drinking.
    • 68 percent believed interlocks were very successful in changing their drunk driving habits.[5]
  • Judicial and administrative enforcement is necessary to the success of interlock enforcement.
  • Nearly 4,000 lives could be saved if ignition interlocks were installed on convicted offenders’ vehicles.[6]

How to Stop a Drunk Driver

The Wisconsin State Journal published this today with the title "A Proactive Sunday Drive." I had made some changes since I first dashed it off and sent it to them for the editorial page. It would have been nice if they had told me they were publishing it and I could have updated it. In addition, it lists me as being a member of SCAODA, which is Wisconsin's State Council on Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse, which I am not, officially. I'm only a parent rep on SCAODA's Subcommittee on Child and Youth Adolescent Treatment--or some such title.


Here's my version of How to Stop a Drunk Driver

My daughter-in-law, Katie, caught a drunk driver on our way back from taking my granddaughter to camp on a summer Sunday. It wasn’t easy, but it was a simple approach that you can take, too, if you care about saving lives. It requires the ability to manage a phone while driving (although a passenger could also take over that task). She dialed 911. Over and over. And something else that many people—at least in Wisconsin--don’t seem to have: the conviction that endangering others by drinking and driving is wrong.

Wisconsin has been rated the worst state for traffic fatalities involving a drunk driver by Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD). A survey by the Appleton Post-Crescent newspaper that ranked all 50 states on ten key areas related to alcohol consumption and impact of drinking found Wisconsin has the most pervasive drinking culture in the country. Other studies show that Wisconsin leads the nation in binge drinking, alcohol use among adults, driving after drinking among high school students, female drinkers of child-bearing age, and possibly the number of infants born with fetal alcohol syndrome.

Driving home to the Madison area after dropping off my oldest grandchild at camp near Prairie du Chien on that Sunday afternoon, when Katie noticed a car weaving around on the highway ahead, she called 911 and notified authorities of our location. With 3 young grandchildren in the van, I cautioned Katie not to follow the potentially impaired driver too closely, but she was determined not to let him out of her sight until authorities showed up. Whether he was drunk or not, he was driving dangerously.

When we didn't see a trooper after the first call, she called again. This time while she was on the phone, the driver veered out of his lane in a small town along the highway, did a U-turn in the middle of the road up onto someone's yard on a corner, bumped down the curb and sped off down a side street. A woman pushing a stroller with a baby in it on the other side of the street narrowly missed being a victim of this driver. Another 60 seconds and the driver would have plowed through people instead of grass. We slowed down and told her we were on the phone with authorities.

Katie gave the dispatcher the intersection and then followed the car, which had simply gone around the block and gotten back on the highway. Once on the highway, two cars back now, we could see he was still weaving dangerously. She called the dispatcher a third time just as the driver went into the other lane of oncoming traffic but still no trooper. After that, the driver suddenly turned off the highway on a small road that went toward a farmhouse and curved through cornfields. At that point, Katie called back and was able to identify the make of the car. We waited off the road until she saw the state trooper approaching and coached the dispatcher on directions.

While this was happening, I was tending to a crying baby in a car seat and quieting a worried 4-year-old who kept saying "Let's go home now." The 2-year-old slept through it all. I don’t advocate this for anyone who is not a 100 percent skilled driver with someone in the car to reassure child passengers. With me as backup, Katie was determined to prevent a potential accident that could easily happen to an unsuspecting mother in a van filled with children traveling in the opposite direction. I am convinced that is exactly what she did.

After she got home, the state trooper called to tell her that he had, in fact, arrested the driver. When he caught him he was driving in the wrong lane and had visible damaged to his car. The officer had a video of the driver’s failed sobriety test and his blood alcohol level was 2.8. Although it remains to be seen how fast the driver is back in his car and what kind of consequence he will receive from the state of Wisconsin, perhaps the most lenient in the country when it comes to drunken driving penalties, it was the outcome Katie was hoping for. There is no question in my mind that Katie saved lives that Sunday.

In September I'll be flying to Dallas to receive a 2008 MADD Media Award for my blog entries on drunk driving at www.motherwarriors.blogspot.com. I can bring a guest to the awards luncheon at the annual MADD conference. I hope Katie can come. I don't know of anyone who has more clearly demonstrated what it takes to get a drunk driver off the road before an accident happens and I dedicate my MADD award to her and others like her who not only care about protecting their families from drunk drivers, but who take responsibility for protecting everyone’s families—including the family of the drunk driver.

Katie not only called 911 to report a reckless driver, she stuck with it until a trooper showed up. Who knows how far the impaired man had already driven without anyone taking the initiative to get him off the road--or what might have happened had Katie not called 911? As long as observers think this is par for the course for a Sunday drive in Wisconsin, we’re going to retain our rankings as the worst state for consequences of drinking too much.

If you want to save a life, call 911 when you see reckless driving. Take a drunk driver off the road. It makes a difference, at least for a day, for hundreds or thousands of people driving on, biking on, or walking near a road. Heck, it can even save those who live in houses along any street. Our Sunday driver nearly hit a house. Think it couldn’t happen to you or your loved ones? Dawn Dartez plowed into a senior housing complex in Oregon, Wisconsin, in October 2005, killing a 77-year-old woman who was asleep in her bed, then drove home without reporting the accident (she was sentenced in February 2008 to 6 months in jail).

What if someone had called 911 when they saw Dartez leaving a bar drunk, weaving on the road, or even before she got in the car? It boggles the mind to know how simple and effective it would be if people were so strongly convinced that drinking and driving is wrong that they would call 911 on a relative, friend, or stranger who is driving drunk. The lives you save could be those of my granddaughters or your granddaughters.

By the way, this is the third time Katie has caught a drunk driver by persistently calling 911 until she saw that the situation was going to be pursued by authorities.