The main reason people drive drunk today is because they can. Technology currently exists that has the potential to eliminate repeat drunk driving offenses – the alcohol ignition interlock. To realize a nation without drunk driving, we must substantially increase the use of ignition interlocks to include all convicted drunk driving offenders.
- An alcohol ignition interlock is a small, sophisticated device – about the size of a cell phone – which is installed into the starting circuit of a vehicle.
- A driver must blow into the device and the vehicle will not start if the driver has measurable alcohol (set to a predetermined level) in their system.
- If the driver does not have alcohol above the measurable level in their system, the vehicle will start normally.
- Interlocks may be set for “running retests,” which require a driver to provide breath tests at regular intervals, preventing drivers from asking a sober friend to start the car.
- If a driver fails a running retest, the vehicle’s horn will honk and/or the lights will flash to alert law enforcement – the vehicle will not stop. The interlock does not have the ability to stop the vehicle once it is running for safety reasons.
- Alcohol ignition interlocks are proven to be an effective tool in the battle against drunk driving.
- Studies have shown ignition interlocks are an average of 64 percent effective in reducing repeat drunk driving offenses.[1]
- Research shows that those convicted of drunk driving for the first time have driven drunk more than 87 times before their first arrest.[2]
- Two-thirds of drunk driving offenders continue to drive even when their license is suspended.
- Only one out of eight convicted drunk drivers each year currently has an interlock on their vehicle.
- There are 1.4 million DUI/DWI arrests and about 1 million convictions made every year but only 135,000 vehicles with ignition interlocks nationwide.
- 65 percent of the public favors mandatory interlocks for first-time convicted offenders.[3]
- 85 percent of the public favors mandatory interlocks for repeated convicted offenders.[4]
- Offenders themselves believe interlocks are a fair and effective sanction:
- 82 percent believe interlocks were very effective in preventing them from driving after drinking.
- 68 percent believed interlocks were very successful in changing their drunk driving habits.[5]
- Judicial and administrative enforcement is necessary to the success of interlock enforcement.
- Nearly 4,000 lives could be saved if ignition interlocks were installed on convicted offenders’ vehicles.[6]
0 comments:
Post a Comment